Subject: Interface specification in route(8)
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Lucio de Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/22/1999 19:51:00
I seem to have an irresolvable problem, but I'm sure I'm just
misunderstanding something.
I have the following active network configuration in a NetBSD-1.3.3-i386
system:
# netstat -in
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
ne1 1500 <Link> 00:80:ad:af:a6:c7 84263 0 693 0 0
ne1 1500 192.168.30.16 192.168.30.22 84263 0 693 0 0
lo0 32976 <Link> 4420 0 4420 0 0
lo0 32976 127 127.0.0.1 4420 0 4420 0 0
ppp0 1500 <Link> 12758 0 12568 0 0
ppp0 1500 192.168.30.16 192.168.30.22 12758 0 12568 0 0
ppp1* 1500 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
ppp2* 1500 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
ppp3* 1500 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
sl0* 296 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
sl1* 296 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
sl2* 296 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
sl3* 296 <Link> 0 0 0 0 0
and I'm trying to add a default route via ne1, the gateway being
192.168.30.17.
# route add default 192.168.30.17
The result is disappointing:
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface
default 192.168.30.17 UGS 0 0 - ppp0
^^^^
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 - lo0
192.96.32.128/26 192.96.32.131 UGS 0 0 - ppp0
192.96.32.131 192.168.30.22 UH 2 3793 - ppp0
192.168.30.16/29 link#1 UC 0 0 - ne1
192.168.30.17 00:c0:05:03:31:6d UHL 1 16 - ne1
192.168.30.22 00:80:ad:af:a6:c7 UHL 0 4388 - lo0
I tried:
# route add -ifp ne1 default 192.168.30.17
but route(8) seems to expect something else after -ifp, it seems to try
to resolve the "ne1".
Before I return to that, I tried -ifp 0 and -ifp 1, assuming that
perhaps an index was required, but I got no results. -ifa would seem
to need an address, but 192.168.30.22 is assigned to both ne1 and ppp0,
so it would not seem to act as a selector at all.
So, I looked at route(8)'s sources. Can't quite figure out from the
available information, not even after looking at /usr/include/netinet/
in_var.h what I'm supposed to understand IFP to mean.
Help, anyone? Perhaps some indication where to look? I have copies of
TCP/IP Illustrated, if I should look there, but I honestly don't know
where to start looking.
And while I'm asking, where could I find the updated traceroute(8) that
automatically selects the most sensible interface rather than the first
one?
++L
PS: seems I'm having trouble resubscribing to tech-net, so if you see
this you might have to reply off the list to get to me :-(