Subject: Re: IP Tunneling I think ?
To: None <>
From: Michael Richardson <>
List: tech-net
Date: 01/27/1999 02:14:42

>>>>> "Craig" == Craig Metz <> writes:
    Craig>   They appear to be building a real and standards-compliant
    Craig> version of IPsec.  On multiple occasions, they whined
    Craig> loudly and tried to get features removed from IPsec because
    Craig> they didn't feel like implementing them. Traffic analysis

  Which isn't to say that they won't go ahead and fail to implement
them *in the release* -- they also wanted to use reserved fields to
indicate a different RSA signature format instead of creating a new
signature type.
    Craig> on features that Microsoft wanted to remove from the specs
    Craig> might give you some ideas as to what is minimally
    Craig> implemented and what's more useable.

  searchable at  [updated to Jan 1. yesterday]
  Also the VPN consortium recently announced another archive. 

  But, we need to put put IPsec into an international NetBSD... which
reminds that I was supposed to talk to Craig about the merging efforts.

]              Have encryption. Will travel.                    |1 Fish/2 Fish[
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |Red F./Blow F[
] |strong crypto[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface