Subject: Return Message
To: None <>
From: ORAPOST <>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/24/1998 17:14:00
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, Sep 23, 1998 at 12:03:33PM -0400, Andrew Brown wrote:
> so...(feeling a little foolish) does this accomplish anything that
> couldn't be done using tun0 and a suitable userspace daemon?

Dunno :-) 

> what's the difference?

As I understand it, tun gives you byte by byte, while in the (kernel)
gre interface, the interface gets a L3 packet in a (list of) mbuf(s)
where the encapsulation is more or less easily done. While with tun,
you have to scan for packet boundaries yourself.

I see tun more as interface to implement e.g. userland ppp. I also
don't know about performance.

          See <a href="">NetBSD</a> for a multiplatform
Bloss weil Du den Source von Deinem Betriebssystem hast, entbindet
Dich das nicht von der Pflicht dein Hirn zu gebrauchen.
			-- Chris Badura in <>