Subject: Re: Unnumbered interfaces and routing entries
To: Heiko W.Rupp <email@example.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/11/1998 09:19:02
> On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 04:04:55PM +0200, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
> > > Is something like (e.g. route add a.b.c.d ppp0) this planned to
> > > support on NetBSD ?
> > The 4.4BSD routing doesn't go to interfaces, but rather:
> Exactly - that is why I asked if there are plans to support thee other
Yes, but what would be the win? (Other than maybe a cleaner interface in
some cases, where we now we have the default route on the other end, but
don't know its address until the PPP connection is up? But in this case,
strictly speaking, you should use a routing protocol instead.)
I must admit that I liked this feature of KA9Q, too, when I used it. But I'm
not sure its enough of a win that I should have trouble implementing it.
> Q: What do you call a person who hacks while wearing no clothes?
> A: A gnudist.
Gnudism is really a win currently :-)