Subject: Re: Unnumbered interfaces and routing entries
To: Erik E. Fair <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/10/1998 20:50:20
On Mon, Aug 10, 1998 at 11:30:21AM -0700, Erik E. Fair wrote:
> Make no mistake - I think it's a good goal because we save IPv4
> address space by doing it. However, I think it's harder than it
> looks at first glance.

We don't. We can already share the local address of p2p interfaces with some
other interface, if we like, and the remote address of p2p interface with
some other interface of the remote node, if they like.

I do it all the time.