Lucio de Re writes:
> According to "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> :
> > I don't know what the rationale is. I have been told it is "better",
> > but not of details why. It might be an issue of a more active
> > development team, or it might be an issue of a better stack, or both
> > -- I really don't know. "We report the news, we don't make it..."
>
> Is an objective comparative analysis of the different implementations 
> entirely out of the question?

I'm sure it would be fine, but I'm not the one to do it. I just
happened to know the INRIA stack was the current front runner -- not
the details of why.

.pm