Subject: Re: wierd behaviour of mkdir(2)
To: Yoav Cohen-Sivan <yoavcs@zahav.net.il>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 10/19/2000 23:13:53
[ On Thursday, October 19, 2000 at 23:55:08 (+0200), Bert Driehuis wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: wierd behaviour of mkdir(2)
>
> It is an old debate that has no Posixly correct answer, if I recall
> right. It is very counterintuitive to allow mkdir to implicitly descend
> into the directory it is about to create, and the only reason this
> practice is so widespread is that historically System V allowed this
> (due to a bug in their namei implementation, to add insult to injury).

NO!  Not a bug -- a very explict design *feature* that's been there
since at least v6, if not before!  UTSL!

-- 
							Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoods@acm.org>      <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>