Subject: Re: ANSI vs. K&R
To: David Holland <dholland@cs.toronto.edu>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 03/12/1999 17:34:16
David Holland <dholland@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> The best long-term solution for this problem is to write a new backend
> for gcc that emits K&R C, and treat the old compiler as the assembler
> pass. Then you can use those archaic compilers if you have to (that
> is, until the gcc port is ready) without kludging up the source.

You mean, like "unprotoize"?

Perry
:)