Subject: Re: ANSI vs. K&R
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: tech-misc
Date: 03/12/1999 17:33:41
Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > I don't see any remaining benefit in keeping code "compatible" with
> > old compilers.
> 
> I will note that one of the arguments in favor of retaining
> compatibility with non-ANSI C compilers will pretty much never go away
> with time: NetBSD likes to support "retrocomputing," and bootstrapping
> a port on an old platform can be simpler if you can compile most of
> the code with an old compiler.

Unprotoize will do that for us on the off chance there is a platform
for which it wouldn't be simplest to just build gcc using the native
compiler.

Perry