On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, John Nemeth wrote:

>      I disagree with this.  This is a good ideal for point releases,
> i.e. 1.3.x, but not for major releases.  Major releases should be
> based on features.

Well, yes, but putting the emphasis here seems to me not terribly
productive in this situation, since we have never had a major
release that did not lack a large number of new features. Our
biggest problem is that we consistently wait far too long to get
the next major release out.

cjs
--
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   604 801 5335   De gustibus, aut bene aut nihil.
The most widely ported operating system in the world: http://www.netbsd.org