Re: 10.x performance issue?

[Jarle Greipsland <jarle.greipsland%norid.no@localhost>]

Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> writes:
[ ... ]
> Problem is, 10.x performance is *miserable* in one respect, important
> for their use case: starting X takes foreeeeever.  To cut the new
> hardware out of the list of suspects, I got them to take one of their
> 9.* machines and boot it with a 10 kernel but no other changes; it is
> still much slower (as in, 30 seconds sitting at the root weave before X
> is running enough to work).

Depending on what exactly they mean with "starting X takes
foreeeeever", might this be a case of:
  bin/59958: ctwm: long delay during ctwm_app_menu

					-jarle
-- 
"The average pointer points somewhere in X."
				-- Henry Spencer