Re: uvm_swap compression patch

[Takashi YAMAMOTO <yamt9999%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 7:22 PM Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 04:54:00PM +0900, Takashi YAMAMOTO wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 4:04 AM Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> > > as part of a compressed ram experiment I'd like to try, I've first cleaned up
> > > the current uvm swap support for I noticed that the support for encrypted swap
> > > became distributed and not logical anymore. In the attached patch I've
> > > contracted the encrypted support into the /dev/drum device and removed it from
> > > the specific swap support and callbacks.
> >
> > with the cost of an extra allocation for the common case?
> > (just a question)
>
> That should be patched in v2.

i meant getiobuf in swstrategy. v2 looks same.


>
> With regards,
> Reinoud
>