Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.

To: David Brownlee <abs%absd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 18:10:04 -0400

On May 27, 2026, at 5:56 PM, David Brownlee <abs%absd.org@localhost> wrote:

Presumably the "modern" approach would be to implement it as a layered
filesystem? (I'm not sure how much of a :) to add here...

Well.. badsect(8) exists.

-- thorpej

References:
- bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
  - From: Anders Magnusson
- Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
  - From: David Brownlee

Prev by Date: Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
Next by Date: Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
Previous by Thread: Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
Next by Thread: Re: bad144 - how useful still? Because it's annoyingly ubiquitous.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index