Re: [Cells for NetBSD] Re: Experimental secmodel_jail prototype for NetBSD (early kernel work)

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Matthias Petermann <matthias%d2ux.net@localhost> writes:

> Based on community feedback and a small naming poll, the prototype
> will move forward under the name “Cells for NetBSD”. The goal and
> architecture remain unchanged — the rename mainly helps to avoid
> confusion with FreeBSD Jails and to emphasize that this is intended as
> a NetBSD-native approach.

(Dropping netbsd-users@ as I do not like to send to multiple lists at
once.)

I was going to ask, and never got around to:

  How is this different than FreeBSD jails?

  If so, why?  Is something wrong with FreeBSD jails?

From your page, it sounds like you are doing essentially the same
thing -- which makes sense.  But with renaming, apparently you aren't.
I'm trying to figure out if this is just different to be different, or
if there is a reason to do other than implement what FreeBSD did and use
their code.