Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process

To: Emmanuel Nyarko <emmankoko519%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 19:12:39 -0400

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 04:36:43PM +0000, Emmanuel Nyarko wrote:
> Errmmm, I was thinking that it maybe becomes a default behavior.
> 
> I mean every socket should be owned by the process that the socket was created for.

What will happen when a socket changes hands by file descriptor passing
over a Unix domain socket?

Thor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko

References:
- Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Jonathan Stone
- Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
  - From: Emmanuel Nyarko

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Next by Date: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal to automatically make the owner/user of an accepted socket the current process
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index