Re: SCSI changes - PR58452 for review

[Nat Sloss <nathanialsloss%yahoo.com.au@localhost>]

On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 03:47:23 Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 09:59:21 +1000
> > From: Nathanial Sloss <nathanialsloss%yahoo.com.au@localhost>

> Why do we end up in recursion here?  Why does the driver need to
> decide when to break this recursion?  If drivers sometimes _skip_
> scsipi_run_queue, won't they sometimes wind up with queued xfers that
> never get issued to the hardware?
> 
> It seems to me that either
> 
> (a) scsipi_run_queue -> scsipi_adapter_request -> driver adapt_request
>     ought to arrange for scsipi_done to be invoked asynchronously, and
>     it's a bug for it to call scsipi_done synchronously; or
> 
> (b) if it's really important for driver adapt_request to synchronously
>     call scsipi_done, then that should _never_ synchronously re-enter
>     scsipi_run_queue but instead should _always_ defer to an
>     asynchronous trigger like a softint or something; or
> 
> (c) maybe, if it's really important for _both_ synchronous calls to
>     happen, then when scsipi_done/scsipi_run_queue detects it is being
>     recursively called, the inner call should detect this and do
>     nothing so it can unwind to the outer call to continue processing
>     the queue.
> 
Would this patch suffice, it kicks the queue after calling scsipi_done_once.

I've been running this without issue for a day with heavy (heavy for dse(4)) 
network traffic - so far so good.

Best regards,

Nat

--- a/sys/dev/ic/ncr5380sbc.c	Fri Aug 02 11:45:52 2024 +0000
+++ b/sys/dev/ic/ncr5380sbc.c	Wed Aug 07 09:12:20 2024 +1000
@@ -802,10 +808,13 @@ finish:
 	sc->sc_ncmds--;
 
 	/* Tell common SCSI code it is done. */
-	scsipi_done(xs);
+	scsipi_done_once(xs);
 
 	sc->sc_state = NCR_IDLE;
 	/* Now ncr5380_sched() may be called again. */
+
+	/* Check the queue. */
+	scsipi_channel_thaw(&sc->sc_channel, 0);
 }