tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Proposal: Restore malloc(9) interface
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 10:44:52PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> Note: I am NOT proposing any substantive changes to the implementation
> of the allocator -- I'm just proposing that we go back to the old
> _interface_, using the new pool-cache-based _implementation_, and to
> add lightweight per-CPU, per-tag usage counting to the malloc and free
> paths.
Can we just add tags to kmem(9)? At this point that seems like a path
of lesser resistance, and also it avoids having a standard function
name with a nonstandard interface.
(Also, let's make the tags be typed as pointers instead of an enum)
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index