Re: PROPOSAL: Split uiomove into uiopeek, uioskip

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On May 9, 2023, at 2:21 PM, Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost> wrote:
> 
> tl;dr
> 
> I propose adding uiopeek(buf, n, uio) and uioskip(n, uio) which

I’m not a fan of uioskip() as a name … I think uioadvance() would be better.  Skip implies, to my brain, that the data is being thrown away (even if you’re already consumed it).

-- thorpej