Re: if_wm.c workqueue

[Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:46:31PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> Could you use head of netbsd-9 branch?

Tried that, workqueue now works fine, and this improves a lot
the behavior against heavy flows. 

Is there a way to tune the priority of the workqueue against
user processes?

The wm(4) man page needs a word about this, I will try to update
it. What about the other sysctls?

hw.wm0.q0.txq_free = 4088
hw.wm0.q0.txd_head = 1513
hw.wm0.q0.txd_tail = 1514
hw.wm0.q0.txq_next = 1514
hw.wm0.q0.txq_sfree = 55
hw.wm0.q0.txq_snext = 58
hw.wm0.q0.txq_sdirty = 48
hw.wm0.q0.txq_flags = 0
hw.wm0.q0.txq_stopping = 0
hw.wm0.q0.txq_sending = 1
hw.wm0.q0.rxq_ptr = 82

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost