On Wed 24 Mar 2021 at 13:37:53 -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: [ explanation of direct and indirect configuration ] Is there any reason why it's called direct and indirect? I can't really match those names to the procedures. Maybe some other names would be better, perhaps "config driven" and "hardware driven", or "fixed" vs "autodetect" or something like that? -Olaf. -- ___ Q: "What's an anagram of Banach-Tarski?" -- Olaf "Rhialto" Seibert \X/ A: "Banach-Tarski Banach-Tarski." -- rhialto at falu dot nl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature