[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RAIDframe: what if a disc fails during copyback
Thanks for the detailed answer.
> it's still there, and it does work,
That's reassuring to know.
> but it's not at all performant or system-friendly.
Just how bad is it?
> If you want the components labelled nicely, give the system a reboot
Re-booting our file server is something I like to avoid.
> and behaves very poorly.
Depending on how poorly, I could probably live with it (the RAID in question
is the small system one, not the large user data one).
> In your case, what I'd do is just fail the spare, and initiate a reconstruct
> to the original failed component. (You still have the data on the spare if
> something goes back with the original good component.)
Hm, I guess I would need to re-boot and intervene manually in that case.
Just using the slow copyback looks preferrable if it doesn't take more than
Probably I need to test this on another machine before.
I guess there's no way to initiate a reconstruction to a spare and failing
the specified component only /after/ the reconstruction has completed,
Main Index |
Thread Index |