[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NULL pointer arithmetic issues
>> If we use 0x0, it can be a valid pointer.
>> If we use NULL, it's not expected to work and will eventually
>> generate a syntax erro.
Then someone has severely broken compatability with older versions of
C. 0x0 and (when one of the suitable #includes has been done) NULL
have both historically been perfectly good null pointer constants.
Also...syntax error? Really? _Syntax_ error?? I'd really like to see
what they've done to the grammar to lead to that; I'm having trouble
imagining how that would be done.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |