On 22.11.2019 00:53, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:19:51 +0100
> From: Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>
> Message-ID: <c7e6d254-ff36-d00a-8ee4-2f6b292cdc9b%m00nbsd.net@localhost>
>
> | So in the end which name do we use? Are people really unhappy with _racy()?
> | At least it has a general meaning, and does not imply atomicity or ordering.
>
> I dislike naming discussions, as in general, while there are often a
> bunch of obviously incorrect names (here for example, read_page_data() ...)
> there is very rarely one obviously right answer, and it all really just becomes
> a matter of choice for whoever is doing it.
>
> Nevertheless, perhaps something that says more what is actually happening,
> rather than mentions what doesn't matter (races here), so perhaps something
> like {read,write}_single_cycle() or {read,write}_1_bus_xact() or something
> along those lines ?
>
> kre
>
I think that picking C11 terminology is the way forward. It's settled
probably forever now and it will be simpler to find corresponding
documentation and specification of it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature