On 06.11.2019 12:51, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Le 06/11/2019 à 12:38, Martin Husemann a écrit :
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 12:31:37PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
>>> __read_once(x)
>>> __write_once(x, val)
>>
>> The names are really not helpfull for understanding what is supposed
>> to happen
>> here.
>
> I don't know if you have a better suggestion, but it's basically the naming
> convention that seems to have been used for several years already. Maybe we
> could have something more explicit, like
>
> __{read,write}_racy() or
> __{read,write}_parallel() or
> __{read,write}_concurrent()
>
> But the last one is too long I think.
I propose __write_relaxed() / __read_relaxed().
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature