Re: Removing PF

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

On 2019-04-01 22:30, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On 2019-04-01 15:16, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > > 2) If the effort had been on one firewall instead of three, the one 
> > > chosen
> > > would be more functional.
> >
> > Well, I cannot tell for PF, but IPF is functionnal, I use it a lot and 
> > I
> > am not alone It may have bugs, but if you really have to remove it,
> > please make sure there is an easy migration path.
>
> Yeah. I happen to use ipf as well.
>
> Anecdotal it would appear that npf might be the least tested or used 
> option...

I'm using npf, it works fine for what I need.

The NetBSD project machines are using npf too, so it does get some real 
world
testing.