Re: Removing PF

[Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost>]

On 2019-04-01 22:59, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> > On 2019-04-01 15:16, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > > > 2) If the effort had been on one firewall instead of three, the one 
> > > > chosen
> > > > would be more functional.
> > >
> > > Well, I cannot tell for PF, but IPF is functionnal, I use it a lot and I
> > > am not alone It may have bugs, but if you really have to remove it,
> > > please make sure there is an easy migration path.
> >
> > Yeah. I happen to use ipf as well.
> >
> > Anecdotal it would appear that npf might be the least tested or used 
> > option...
>
> Anecdotal where? I use npf and I've seen traffic from people asking how
> to set it up. It's non-zero and the only ipf/pf users I know of are on
> this thread. This is just a SWAG.

In this thread is exactly why I said "anecdotal".

  Johnny

--
Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost             ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol