Re: Removing PF

[Michael van Elst <mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> 
> > The best way forward to drop PF is to actively develop NPF.
> 
> ... and the best way to actively develop NPF is to stop splitting effort on
> three firewalls

So now you stop maintaining PF and IPF and redirect your efforts to NPF ?
If not you, who does ? Somehow this doesn't fit into your narrative that
there are no maintainers.

Of course, if it's really about rototillng things actively in other places
and to limit the amount of work to fix the fallout, it suddenly becomes
reasonable to remove something you personally don't care about.


> and stop directing users to the three of them ...

It's a choice, users like that, in particular if that choice makes
a difference. Someone like you should understand this.



-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."