Re: Adding new feature - Kcov

[Siddharth Muralee <siddharth.muralee%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:12, Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost> wrote:
>
> In article <CAB5-aq5KCpKOD1T9SFGQm2+NyhG4yFjQRit7F+4jFr=SMuFEmw%mail.gmail.com@localhost>,
> Siddharth Muralee  <siddharth.muralee%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 09:26, Siddharth Muralee <siddharth.muralee%gmail.com@localhost>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello, I have attached a modified patch for kcov(4). I have modified
> >> it to be a per-process lookup instead of the earlier per-unit lookup.
> >>
> >> It seems to working fine. I have tested it with a couple of system
> >> calls. There is however a lot of unnecessary output coming during a
> >> simple system call. I have attached below the output of kcov(4) for
> >> the system call `read(-1, NULL, 0)`. I would also like to get some
> >> input on how to reduce the noise if possible.
> >
> >Seems like the attachments got missed somewhere along the way (Not sure
> >what happened!).
> >kcov diff - https://github.com/R3x/scratch-files/blob/master/kcov/kcov.diff
> >output of kcov(4) for read() -
> >https://github.com/R3x/scratch-files/blob/master/kcov/sample_output.txt
>
> What source version do those line numbers correspond it?

It is of NetBSD-current probably a week old. I have made this one with
the latest version(from GitHub) to avoid any confusion
latest output -
https://github.com/R3x/scratch-files/blob/master/kcov/latest_output.txt


-- 
Regards,
  Siddharth M
  Third Year B.Tech (CSE) Student,
  Amrita School of Engineering, Kollam
  Blog
---------------------------------------
“Most people get ahead during the time that others waste."