Re: API change request. Was => Re: Time accounting on statclock()

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Nov 18, 2018, at 11:00 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 04:19:50PM +0530, Cherry G.Mathew wrote:
>> Typo:
>> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2018/11/18/msg100702.html
> 
> Ugh - can't you just modify
> 
> CLKF_USERMODE(frame)
> CLKF_PC(frame)
> CLKF_INTR(frame)
> 
> for xen making them ignore their frame argument and use the per-cpu cached
> (but more minimal) data instead?

+1

In addition to "we shouldn't even have this hardclock() interrupt anyway", it also makes the signature of hardclock() "not like a regular interrupt handler".

-- thorpej