Re: Things not referenced in kernel configs, but mentioned in files.*

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

coypu%sdf.org@localhost writes:

> So, I am excluding things that appear in ALL, and I am not checking if

But ALL is an x86 thing, currently.

> they appear as modules.

Interesting, but I suppose they then belong in ALL also.

> So far I had complaints about the appearance of 'lm' which cannot be
> safely included in a default kernel, for example.

Sure, lots of things are not ok in GENERIC, but do those concerns apply
to it being in ALL?