Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
From: Michael van Elst <mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 08:43:33 +0200

On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:15:07PM +0200, Michael van Elst wrote:
> The handle_with_rdwr code does lots of weird things.

I've committed a few changes and behaviour is now more reasonable.

Can you test this in a real setup?


-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."

References:
- vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
  - From: Michael van Elst

Prev by Date: Re: nvmm
Next by Date: Re: nvmm
Previous by Thread: Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
Next by Thread: Re: vnode_has_large_blocks() (vnd.c rev 1.255)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index