Re: Too many PMC implementations

To: Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: Too many PMC implementations
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 19:38:00 +0000

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:40:20AM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
 > I saw the thread [Re: Sample based profiling] on tech-userlevel@, I'm not
 > subscribed to this list but I'm answering here because it's related to
 > tprof among other things.
 > 
 > I agree that it would be better to retire gprof in base, because there are
 > more powerful tools now, and also advanced hardware support (PMC, PEBS,
> ProcessorTrace).

Speaking of old ratty tools, got a plan for replacing gcov? :-)

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard

Prev by Date: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Next by Date: Re: Driver for Raspberry Pi 3B+ ethernet adapter (Microchip LAN75xx/LAN78xx)
Previous by Thread: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Next by Thread: usb/xhci lock issue on HEAD
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index