Re: workqueue_drain

[Michael van Elst <mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost>]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 05:32:58AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:

> again (no work can be enqueued if already in the queue).  But I don't
> see how "remember the last work enqueued and wait for it to be done
> before destroying" is more versatile than "waiting for all to be done
> before destroying".  It certainly seems that the latter is a simpler
> approach.

The function is more versatile as it allows other uses than preparing
the queue destruction.

It would be much easier, if the work item had a state field....


-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."