tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3

To: dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost (David Holland), chuq%chuq.com@localhost (Chuck Silvers)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 08:43:23 +0200

David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> (I still believe that ideally no wait should be uninterruptible.)

I agree, and I am especially concerned about ioflush's waiting with
vnode lock held: since it is kernel-bound it cannot ever be interrupted.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 3
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index