Re: nanosecond debiting cv_timedwait

[Christoph Badura <bad%bsd.de@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:31:17AM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> I don't see why that wouldn't work: you're just ignoring the update of
> timeout and repeating the bookkeeping yourself.

Hmm, right.  Lucky for the people who do the mechanical conversion without
thinking, which was my point.

I couldn't think of better name yesterday.  How about cv_boundedwaitns
to emphasize that this puts an upper bound on the wait time?  That could
als serve as a reminder to use the new idiom that you've made possible.

--chris