[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pserialize & hw interrupt
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> I see that vioif(4) schedules another softint from within
> vioif_rx_vq_done(), that would latency a bit longer.
Good point. If I directly call vioif_rx_softint, the performance
improves regardless of softint-ed interrupts on/off. The two
performance are almost same and better than the vanilla.
In the case of softint-ed interrupts on, I think we can safely
remove the indirection. OTOH, in the case of off, I'm not sure
we can do the same thing.
>> +#define VIRTIO_F_PCI_INTR_SOFTINT (2 << 0)
> Usually (1 << 1).
Oops. You're right. Fixed.
Main Index |
Thread Index |