Re: kernel constructor

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:16:13PM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> Ideally the long hardcoded sequence of init functions in init_main:main() is
> converted to a single vector whose order is resolved by modular dependency.
> But for the moment such a hardcoded priority should be good enough to improve
> modularity.

I'm in favor of *any* way we do this so long as we get rid of the second copy
of this code in rump.

In fact, I'm in favor of *any config modification whatsoever* if we can get
rid of the secret special version-7-unix kernel configuration "framework" of
rump.

Thor