Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)

To: pooka%iki.fi@localhost (Antti Kantee), hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost (J. Hannken-Illjes)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:40:12 +0200

Antti Kantee <pooka%iki.fi@localhost> wrote:

> Not sure, but per a quick examination it looks like nfs wants to save
> the error for the next caller.  As long as puffs is synchronous, it 
> won't be an issue.  Notably, though, a puffs file server might like to
> be asynchronous in handling a write and report an error later, but 
> that's getting complicated.  Optimization is not a substitute for 
> correctness ...

Well, should I just remove the code block that wipes error in
puffs_vnop_strategy, then?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
  - From: Antti Kantee

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
Next by Date: Re: rwlock issue in secmodel
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index