tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)
Antti Kantee <pooka%iki.fi@localhost> wrote:
> Not sure, but per a quick examination it looks like nfs wants to save
> the error for the next caller. As long as puffs is synchronous, it
> won't be an issue. Notably, though, a puffs file server might like to
> be asynchronous in handling a write and report an error later, but
> that's getting complicated. Optimization is not a substitute for
> correctness ...
Well, should I just remove the code block that wipes error in
puffs_vnop_strategy, then?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index