tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] PUFFS backend allocation (round 3)



Antti Kantee <pooka%iki.fi@localhost> wrote:

> Not sure, but per a quick examination it looks like nfs wants to save
> the error for the next caller.  As long as puffs is synchronous, it 
> won't be an issue.  Notably, though, a puffs file server might like to
> be asynchronous in handling a write and report an error later, but 
> that's getting complicated.  Optimization is not a substitute for 
> correctness ...

Well, should I just remove the code block that wipes error in
puffs_vnop_strategy, then?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index