Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

> > By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
> > If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?
> 
> hw.machine_arch
> 
> which has been defined for a long long time.

Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and
you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic)
without public discussion.  That's the problem.

---
Izumi Tsutsui