Re: Netbsd /avr32 update.

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 08:36:15PM -0300, Tomas Niño Kehoe wrote:
> The next step, besides continuing / fixing the actual port is to start
> working on the toolchain. Particularly an llvm backend for NetBSD/avr32 seems
> the way to go.

For those of us not knowing the details: isn't avr32 supported by stock gcc?
If not, why? If only in later versions, which?

Creating a new llvm backend might be a good thing, but sounds way more
complex than needed to get this port going. Maybe you should discuss options
on tech-toolchain?

Martin