Re: high load, no bottleneck

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:34:19AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> > On large filesystems with many files fsck can take a really long time after
> > a crash. In my personal experience power outages are much less frequent than
> > crashes (I crash quite a lot since I always fiddle with things). If you
> > don't care about fsck time, you don't need WAPBL. 
> 
> But you just told me that I will need a fsck after crash now I am
> running with vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0 so I wonder if I should not
> just mount without -o log. What are WAPBL benefits when running with
> vfs.wapbl.flush_disk_cache=0?

For a NFS server, I'm not sure there's any benefit ...

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--