tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH

To: Alan Barrett <apb%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:12:36 +0000

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote:
 > If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that
 > O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero.

This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with
FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's
connected to the rest...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
  - From: David Holland

References:
- core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
  - From: Alan Barrett

Prev by Date: Re: Making forced unmounts work
Next by Date: Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
Previous by Thread: Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
Next by Thread: Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index