tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:31:15 +0100

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:23:14PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> But what do you mean vs. mutexes? The vfork child is still in the same 
> process,
> so our mutexes should just work - and as soon as it is not (i.e. the exec
> happens), it does not matter any more.

No, it is in the same address space. It is not the same process.

Joerg

References:
- Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi
- Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
  - From: Martin Husemann

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
Next by Date: Re: MI non-interlocked atomic ops?
Previous by Thread: Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
Next by Thread: Re: RFC: import of posix_spawn GSoC results
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index