Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT

To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
From: Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:20:45 +0000

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:25:39AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> it should retry from puffs_cookie2pnode in that case.

I also need to build a test case that reliabiliy reproduce the bug. 
For now I run our build.sh -Uo release and come back the next day, 
this is not very convenient.

As I understand, I need to lookup a node I arealdy node but is beeing
recycled. When does the kernel decide to recycle a vnode?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi

References:
- Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
  - From: Emmanuel Dreyfus
- Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi

Prev by Date: Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
Next by Date: Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
Previous by Thread: Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
Next by Thread: Re: PUFFS and existing file that get ENOENT
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index