Re: wapbl module

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:24:48AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> I realize that even though wapbl registers itself as a module, it is
> not built as a loadable module - ie, it must be "built-in".  I
> intend to try to change this, so I would like to know if wapbl is
> ever intended for non-ffs file systems.

The WAPBL option changes the buffer subsystem, that's why it can't
easily be modularized.

Joerg