re: the bouyer-quota2 branch

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> > > > that seems reasonable to me.
> > > 
> > > What do you propose then ? quotactl is the best name I can find for this
> > > syscall ...
> > 
> > quotactl2?  quotapctl?  quota_pctl?  quotactl_the_next_generation?
> > ... quota_king?
> 
> All are 
> > 
> > Considering that quotactl is not used by programmers (unless they're
> > hacking on the quota utils ;) I don't think we need to spend a lot
> 
> someone who looks at quotactl(8) will also look at quotactl(2) ...
> 
> > of energy on picking the name.  If we want to follow a common naming
> 
> Agreed. So let's keep quotactl(2) ... it's fine and is working.

i'd rather use quotactl2() than the old name.

other ideas:
        
        quotapropctl()
        quotaprop()

and i'd be ok with quotapctl() as well.


.mrg.