Re: next vforkup chapter: lwpctl

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> The following patch makes a vfork child update the parent's lwpctl area
> while the child is running.  Comments or better ideas?

I think this is a very good case of "don't do that". malloc after
vfork() is just wrong. If rumphijack internally forces that for normal
system calls, it should downgrade vfork() to fork().

Joerg