Re: Heads up: moving some uvmexp stat to being per-cpu

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:

> On 15.12.2010 19:43, Matt Thomas wrote:
>> 
>> On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Matt Thomas 
>>>>> <matt%3am-software.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>> The diffs are at http://www.netbsd.org/uvmexp-diff.txt
>>> 
>>> Purely cosmetic comments:
>>> - why are most of the cpu_nsoft count commented out?
>> 
>> Because we were counting ASTs as soft interrupts but they aren't.
>> kern_softint.c already counts soft interrupts.
> 
> Alright, thanks for the explanation :) Are you going to add another
> counter for ASTs or leave the commented code as-is?

Don't know.  Should we count ASTs?  Do we really care how many we get?