Re: NiLFS(2) import

To: Mark Weinem <mark.weinem%alumni.uni-due.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: NiLFS(2) import
From: haad <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:51:12 +0200

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Mark
Weinem<mark.weinem%alumni.uni-due.de@localhost> wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
>
>> No, not particularly, any more than adding ext2fs was a step toward
>> removing ffs, or adding ext3fs would be a step toward removing WAPBL.
>
> Why do we want to keep LFS when we have NiLFS?
> Who maintains LFS?

LFS was broken and is unmaintained for a long time.


-- 


Regards.

Adam

References:
- NiLFS(2) import
  - From: Reinoud Zandijk
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: David Holland
- Re: NiLFS(2) import
  - From: Mark Weinem

Prev by Date: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Next by Date: Re: 5.0: locking panic when running atf-run as root
Previous by Thread: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Next by Thread: Re: NiLFS(2) import
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index