tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: A small cgd(4) diff
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:07:03PM +0200, haad wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Jukka Ruohonen<jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a small byproduct from debugging cgd(4); use mutex(9) instead of lock(9).
>
>
> > --- src/sys/dev/cgd.c 5 Jun 2009 19:21:02 -0000 1.58
> > +++ src/sys/dev/cgd.c 10 Jul 2009 09:27:10 -0000
> > @@ -165,9 +165,8 @@ cgdsoftc_init(struct cgd_softc *cs, int
> > {
> > char sbuf[DK_XNAME_SIZE];
> >
> > - memset(cs, 0x0, sizeof(*cs));
>
> This memset seems reasonable to me, why have you removed it ?
I thought that zeroing the whole buffer with M_ZERO would yield the same
result.
- Jukka.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index